Cyabra Launches Deepfake Detection

Analyzing Fake Profiles’ Impact on Romania’s Election Crisis

Romania is heading for presidential elections… again.

Nationwide protests erupted shortly after the Romanian Constitutional Court annulled the previous election results. The court’s decision came in the wake of allegations of electoral misconduct linked to Russian influence.

While demonstrators continue to flood the streets, Cyabra’s analysis reveals that the manipulation tactics that plunged Romania into crisis are resurfacing again: Fake profiles, bot networks, and coordinated disinformation campaigns, many linked to Russia, have flooded discourse about the Romanian election, distorting public perception and fueling instability.

This operation was strategic, deliberate, and designed to undermine trust in democratic institutions while promoting far-right nationalist narratives.

Here’s what Cyabra uncovered:

When Fake Accounts Fan Real Flames

Cyabra analyzed online discussions that followed Romania’s annulled elections at the end of 2024 and the beginning of 2025. What emerged was a clear pattern: 16% of profiles participating in the conversation on X were fake, and they played an outsized role in pushing anti-government and anti-Western narratives.

These fake profiles focused on three key strategies:

  • Boosting nationalist political figures like Călin Georgescu
  • Undermining Western institutions such as the EU and NATO
  • Hijacking hashtags to suppress accusations of foreign interference


These efforts were tightly coordinated and highly strategic, designed to deepen public distrust and political polarization.

In the picture: Posts from fake accounts spreading disinformation about Romania’s election on X.

Manufacturing Support for Far-Right Candidates

One of the primary goals of the fake profiles’ disinformation campaign was boosting the visibility and influence of Călin Georgescu, a far-right politician who was elected president in Romania’s annulled elections and has since emerged as a key protest leader.

Cyabra’s investigation identified Georgescu’s X account, @CG_Romania, as a central figure in the online unrest. Between December 15, 2024, and January 15, 2025, Georgescu shared over 50 posts, generating a potential reach of 264 million views – however, much of this online momentum wasn’t organic. 

Georgescu claimed corruption and accused “oligarchic-globalist powers” of undermining Romania’s democracy. Cyabra’s analysis uncovered that 13% of the accounts engaging with Georgescu’s content were fake, strategically amplifying his narratives through coordinated comments, shares, and interactions. One of those key posts, with a 13 million potential views, was massively dominated by fake profiles, which accounted for 34% of the post’s engagement. Those fake interactions magnified Georgescu’s claims, presenting the illusion of widespread popular support. Fake accounts promoted pro-Georgescu, ultra-nationalist, and populist narratives and framed Georgescu as the sole leader capable of restoring freedom from foreign influence.

In the picture: X posts amplifying support for Călin Georgescu (@CG_Romania).

Hijacking the Narrative Against the West

The fake accounts didn’t just promote Georgescu; they also attacked Western institutions, accusing the EU and NATO of manipulating Romania’s election.

Common narratives included claims that Romania was a puppet state controlled by global elites, accusations that the EU orchestrated the election crisis to maintain influence over Eastern Europe, and calls for Romania to break away from Western alliances in favor of “true independence.”

By flooding hashtags like #călingeorgescu, #protest, and #interference, these fake profiles dominated online conversations, pushed anti-Western conspiracy theories, and suppressed authentic debate about Russian interference.

Cyabra’s analysis also revealed that bot activity surged in the lead-up to major protests in Bucharest. As tensions mounted offline, fake profiles ramped up online narratives that framed the protests as a patriotic uprising against Western control.

By tying the protests to themes of freedom, sovereignty, and resistance to elites, fake accounts ensured that nationalist, anti-Western sentiment was front and center as the demonstrations unfolded.

Cyabra also identified that posts by high-profile figures like Alex Jones and Shawn Ryan were infiltrated by fake profiles, with 21% of total engagement on their posts coming from inauthentic accounts, potentially reaching a combined 447 million views.

The posts themselves often echoed themes of globalist conspiracies, loss of freedom, and elite control, messaging that aligned with the disinformation campaign targeting Romania.

How Coordinated Disinformation Undermines Democracies

Cyabra’s findings highlight how coordinated disinformation campaigns strategically destabilize democracies by amplifying polarizing nationalist narratives, undermining trust in elections and Western institutions, and exploiting platform algorithms to maximize exposure.

The fake profiles’ tactics followed a clear, cohesive playbook:

  • Amplifying polarizing narratives through populist, nationalist, and anti-Western messaging.
  • Using the same key phrases, hashtags, and rhetoric across varied conversations to reinforce distrust.
  • Deploying shared language like “globalist powers,” “elite,” and hashtags such as #Freedom and #NewWorldOrder 
  • Linking Romania’s crisis to broader conspiracy narratives seen in US and European elections.

These campaigns blend seamlessly into authentic conversations, making them difficult to detect – until their cumulative influence reshapes public perception.

Protecting Elections in the Age of Disinformation

Cyabra’s analysis makes one thing clear: coordinated digital manipulation is no longer an emerging threat; it’s an active force currently shaping political realities. 

To protect democratic processes, governments must detect fake profiles early before they hijack conversations, monitor emerging narratives in real time to identify disinformation campaigns, and educate the public to recognize and resist coordinated manipulation efforts.

As we head into an era of AI-enhanced disinformation, safeguarding the integrity of elections will require vigilance, agility, and powerful detection tools.

Learn more about Cyabra’s capabilities in monitoring election discourse, uncovering fake campaigns, and identifying bot networks in real time.

Related posts

Fake News, Real War: the Disinformation Frontline

As disinformation has been part of our lives for so long, once in a while it’s important we take a step back from the mountains...

Illustration of hooded hackers manipulating global information while citizens combat fake news with megaphone and oversized smartphone showing social media icons

Rotem Baruchin

May 16, 2023

US Elections Disinformation Tracker: Presidential Debate

Struggling to navigate the flood of fake news, disinformation campaigns, and conspiracy theories surrounding the upcoming US presidential elections? Cyabra has got you covered!

Stylized U.S. map filled with red and blue social media icons connected by network lines, representing Cyabra’s tracker for election disinformation

Rotem Baruchin

September 26, 2024

Why Do Fake Profiles Exist, and What Do They Want?

3 key reasons for the presence of inauthentic profiles on social networks Written by Cyabra’s analyst, Dean Shoshana Fake profiles and bots on social media...

People on smartphones with icons for Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Telegram, Reddit and email symbolizing the spread of online disinformation across platforms

Rotem Baruchin

February 9, 2023