Boycott Similac

Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.

Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.

#National Security

Share this report
Tweet from Robert Reich stating that 89% of the U.S. baby formula market is dominated by four companies, warning that high concentration magnifies supply shocks like the Similac recall and urging stronger antitrust enforcement against Abbott
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Pride Month and Rainbowashing

June 18, 2022

Consumer rage grows as brands celebrate Pride Month while supporting anti-LGBTQ politicians.

US dollar bills scattering across rainbow flag stripes, symbolizing brands profiting from Pride Month

#Brand Reputation

Citibank

July 2, 2022

Inauthentic users create one-third of negative content regarding Citibank, primarily on Facebook.

Citibank logo on a white card overlapping a red and blue stylized credit card against a purple gradient background

#Brand Reputation

How Inauthentic Networks Fueled Indonesia’s Unrest

September 3, 2025

Findings from Cyabra uncover widespread fake profiles manipulating discourse and fueling polarization during Indonesia’s protests.

#National Security, Threat Actors