Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
The effect of the pullout from Russia on the online discourse toward brands
March 2, 2022
An investigation into Twitter conversations surrounding five brands' business decisions with Russia.
The NATO Summit
June 18, 2022
Inauthentic users spreading disinformation created a negative trend toward NATO
McDonald’s – Social Media Analysis
June 18, 2024
Cyabra analyzed the main narratives and fake accounts contributing to negative sentiment around McDonald's.
