Boycott Similac

May 2, 2022

Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.

Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.

#National Security

Share this report
Tweet from Robert Reich stating that 89% of the U.S. baby formula market is dominated by four companies, warning that high concentration magnifies supply shocks like the Similac recall and urging stronger antitrust enforcement against Abbott
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Bot Networks Amplify Controversial US Influencers

May 6, 2024

Cyabra analysis of high fake follower rates and interactions on influencer posts.

Bubble chart showing clusters of fake accounts targeting Jackson Hinkle, Muhammad Smiry, Motaz, Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis, and Mohamed Safa

#National Security, Threat Actors

New York Community Bank – Social Media Analysis

June 24, 2024

Cyabra scanned the NYCB stock discussions on X and categorized the authenticity and impact of the profiles.

Network diagram of coordinated accounts alongside identical posts marked FAKE in Cyabra’s analysis of New York Community Bank chatter

#Stocks

Online Reputation – First Republic Bank

March 1, 2023

Inauthentic users spreading disinformation created a negative trend toward First Republic Bank.

Bar chart of First Republic Bank social media sentiment from March 10–17 2023 showing daily negative percentages of –20%, –24%, –30%, –28%, –37%, –11%, –15%, and –13%

#Brand Reputation