Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
Pride Month and Rainbowashing
June 18, 2022
Consumer rage grows as brands celebrate Pride Month while supporting anti-LGBTQ politicians.

Citibank
July 2, 2022
Inauthentic users create one-third of negative content regarding Citibank, primarily on Facebook.

How Inauthentic Networks Fueled Indonesia’s Unrest
September 3, 2025
Findings from Cyabra uncover widespread fake profiles manipulating discourse and fueling polarization during Indonesia’s protests.

