Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
The Netflix Effect
August 18, 2022
A study of social trends that followed the most successful Netflix shows.

New York Community Bank – Social Media Analysis
June 24, 2024
Cyabra scanned the NYCB stock discussions on X and categorized the authenticity and impact of the profiles.

Portugal Election Manipulation: The Impact of Fake Profiles
May 19, 2025
Cyabra analyzed online discourse preceding Portugal’s 2025 election and uncovered fake campaigns targeting parties and candidates from both sides of the political landscape.

