Boycott Similac

Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.

Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.

#National Security

Share this report
Tweet from Robert Reich stating that 89% of the U.S. baby formula market is dominated by four companies, warning that high concentration magnifies supply shocks like the Similac recall and urging stronger antitrust enforcement against Abbott
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Nepal’s Protests Show Fake Profiles Driving Real Impact

September 9, 2025

Cyabra reveals how inauthentic actors blended into Nepal’s protests to magnify outrage and reach millions.

#National Security, Threat Actors

US Healthcare

August 2, 2022

Inauthentic profiles are amplifying negative social media commentary regarding American healthcare.

Bubble chart of online sentiment about US healthcare from August 17 to 25 2022, showing conversation spikes and annotation of the announcement that the US government will no longer pay for Covid-19 vaccines and treatments

#National Security

The Manufactured Outrage Around Swatch

August 27, 2025

Cyabra identified coordinated inauthentic behavior shaping the online narrative following Swatch’s controversial ad campaign.

#Brand Reputation, Threat Actors