Boycott Similac

Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.

Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.

#National Security

Share this report
Tweet from Robert Reich stating that 89% of the U.S. baby formula market is dominated by four companies, warning that high concentration magnifies supply shocks like the Similac recall and urging stronger antitrust enforcement against Abbott
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Saudi Arabia ‘Neom Project’

January 2, 2020

An analysis of portions of fake accounts commenting on the Neom Project.

Area chart showing October 1, 2021 social media activity about the NEOM project; blue line represents all content peaking at nearly 70,000 posts around noon, orange line shows negative content (~7,000 posts), and red line indicates content from fake profiles (~7,500 posts)

#National Security

Election Monitoring – China-Taiwan Relations

November 12, 2023

Cyabra identified bots manipulating social discourse about the Taiwanese elections.

Network diagram of online account clusters next to two Chinese-language social media posts used in influence campaign analysis

#Elections

Event & Venue Risk Assessment – Barclays

May 11, 2023

Cyabra discovered an account creating conversations about disruptions to Barclays meeting.

Twitter profile for XR Money Rebellion with a bright yellow-green banner stating “IF OUR LIVES WERE BANKS, THEY WOULD HAVE BAILED US BY NOW” and the Extinction Rebellion hourglass logo

#Brand Reputation