Boycott Similac

Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.

Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.

#National Security

Share this report
Tweet from Robert Reich stating that 89% of the U.S. baby formula market is dominated by four companies, warning that high concentration magnifies supply shocks like the Similac recall and urging stronger antitrust enforcement against Abbott
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Impersonation – American Express

May 11, 2023

Two accounts were found to be impersonation American Express customer service accounts.

Twitter profile impersonating American Express titled Ask Amex, featuring the AMEX logo, zero tweets, and a bio claiming the old account was suspended

#Brand Reputation

Impersonation – Bank of America

May 11, 2023

Cyabra discovered 7 identical accounts impersonating Bank of America’s customer service.

Three impersonated “Bank of America Customer Service” social-media pages shown side by side, illustrating how fraudsters replicate the brand

#Brand Reputation, Threat Actors

Pandora Papers

October 2, 2021

Identifying inauthentic accounts leading the discussion on Pandora Papers in Korea.

Two Twitter replies discussing tax amnesty, Panama Papers, and Pandora Papers on a purple gradient background

#National Security