Boycott Similac

Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.

Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.

#National Security

Share this report
Tweet from Robert Reich stating that 89% of the U.S. baby formula market is dominated by four companies, warning that high concentration magnifies supply shocks like the Similac recall and urging stronger antitrust enforcement against Abbott
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Cyabra Named Innovation Leader by Frost & Sullivan: Full Report

April 23, 2025

Frost & Sullivan analyzed the social media intelligence (SOCMINT) market and, based on its findings, recognized Cyabra with the 2025 North American Technology Innovation Leadership...

Cyabra named 2025 Technology Innovation Leader by Frost & Sullivan, recognizing best practices in North American social media intelligence solutions

#Brand Reputation, National Security, Threat Actors

Planet Fitness

April 2, 2024

Fake profiles spreading the boycott hashtags, with the first ever mention being fake.

Collage of three fabricated Twitter posts labelled FAKE featuring #BoycottPlanetFitness messages, a Planet Fitness trending screenshot, and a pixel-art game image, highlighting disinformation targeting the gym chain

#Brand Reputation

Aldi Social Media Analysis

August 2, 2022

Analysis of online content regarding Aldi and its competitors by inauthentic accounts.

Colored gauge depicting Aldi’s social media sentiment from positive green to negative red, needle pointing toward negative red zone

#Brand Reputation