Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
Cyabra Named Innovation Leader by Frost & Sullivan: Full Report
April 23, 2025
Frost & Sullivan analyzed the social media intelligence (SOCMINT) market and, based on its findings, recognized Cyabra with the 2025 North American Technology Innovation Leadership...

Planet Fitness
April 2, 2024
Fake profiles spreading the boycott hashtags, with the first ever mention being fake.

Aldi Social Media Analysis
August 2, 2022
Analysis of online content regarding Aldi and its competitors by inauthentic accounts.

