Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
Phantom Fans Influencing the ESPN Conversation
July 29, 2025
Cyabra revealed that 41% of anti-ESPN discourse came from fake profiles, which reached an estimated audience of 150,000.

Portugal Election Manipulation: The Impact of Fake Profiles
May 19, 2025
Cyabra analyzed online discourse preceding Portugal’s 2025 election and uncovered fake campaigns targeting parties and candidates from both sides of the political landscape.

Digital Manipulation Around Bolsonaro’s Trial
September 7, 2025
Cyabra's analysis reveals competing influence campaigns exploiting Bolsonaro’s trial to sway Brazil’s political discourse.

