Boycott Similac

Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.

Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.

#National Security

Share this report
Tweet from Robert Reich stating that 89% of the U.S. baby formula market is dominated by four companies, warning that high concentration magnifies supply shocks like the Similac recall and urging stronger antitrust enforcement against Abbott
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

The Netflix Effect

August 18, 2022

A study of social trends that followed the most successful Netflix shows.

Illustration of influencers and marketers guiding social-media buzz through a Netflix-branded funnel on a monitor, converting it into coins to depict revenue impact

#Brand Reputation

New York Community Bank – Social Media Analysis

June 24, 2024

Cyabra scanned the NYCB stock discussions on X and categorized the authenticity and impact of the profiles.

Network diagram of coordinated accounts alongside identical posts marked FAKE in Cyabra’s analysis of New York Community Bank chatter

#Stocks

Portugal Election Manipulation: The Impact of Fake Profiles

May 19, 2025

Cyabra analyzed online discourse preceding Portugal’s 2025 election and uncovered fake campaigns targeting parties and candidates from both sides of the political landscape.

Bar chart of fake-profile engagement in Portuguese election conversations: Chega 411, André Ventura 771, Socialist Party 350, Pedro Nuno Santos 368, Social Democratic Party 81, and Luís Montenegro 406

#Elections, Threat Actors