Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
Burger King – Social Media Analysis
June 5, 2024
Cyabra analyzed the main narratives and fake accounts driving negative sentiment toward Burger King.

Morocco Trade Deals Cancellation over Western Sahara
October 2, 2021
High level of inauthentic profiles within discussions regarding EU-Moroccan trade deals.

DeepSeek AI: Coordinated Fake Campaign
February 9, 2025
Cyabra uncovered a network of fake profiles promoting the hype around DeepSeek AI.

