Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
Burger King – Social Media Analysis
June 5, 2024
Cyabra analyzed the main narratives and fake accounts driving negative sentiment toward Burger King.
State Farm: Misinformation and Reputation Damage After Wildfires
February 13, 2025
Cyabra uncovered a huge wave of misinformation accusing State Farm of having "prior knowledge" of the wildfires.
Brand Reputation & Crisis Management – Bud Light
June 9, 2023
Cyabra researched the coordinated boycott against Bud Light.
