Burger King – Social Media Analysis

Cyabra analyzed the main narratives and fake accounts driving negative sentiment toward Burger King.

Cyabra detected a spike in negative sentiment surrounding Burger King on X and determined that 37% of content was negative.

Fake profiles largely distributed the content which posed reputation risks to the brand, accounting for 39% of profiles discussing Burger King.

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Line graph tracking Burger King–related social media profiles between 25 May and 23 June 2024, displaying 862 total profiles with a peak surge at the end of May; green line represents 524 authentic profiles (60%) and red line represents 337 inauthentic profiles (39%)
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Unmasking the Shadows

March 3, 2025

Cyabra analyzed state-sponsored fake campaign and bot network to understand their impact on public perception.

Network visualization of clustered social media accounts, large green circles illustrating conversation volume and red dots marking suspected disinformation sources

#National Security, Threat Actors

Android – Social Media Analysis

June 20, 2024

Cyabra analyzed the influence of fake profiles discussing Android on X and Facebook.

Line chart comparing authentic and inauthentic Twitter accounts (1,742 total) with a highlighted spike in late May, showing 27% inauthentic profiles, plus thumbnail cards of three accounts marked as fake

#Brand Reputation

Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

March 1, 2023

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers

#Brand Reputation