McDonald’s – Social Media Analysis

Cyabra analyzed the main narratives and fake accounts contributing to negative sentiment around McDonald's.

Cyabra determined that 36% of the conversation surrounding McDonald's on X and Facebook was negative and had the potential to reach 1 billion views.

The fake profiles also called for boycotting the fast food chain on X due to their business ties with Israel. These posts had the potential to reach  732,000 views.

 

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Line area chart comparing positive versus negative McDonald’s mentions on social media between 25 May and 23 June 2024; headline stats show 1,338 total profiles and 488 (36%) classified as negative spreaders
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

March 1, 2023

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers

#Brand Reputation

The Digital Battlefield: Venezuela, the U.S., and the Fight for Narrative Power

September 7, 2025

Cyabra uncovered coordinated fake campaigns infiltrating Venezuela–U.S. conversations, blurring truth and driving geopolitical influence.

#National Security, Threat Actors

Brand Reputation – Starbucks

April 1, 2023

Analysis of negative sentiment towards Starbucks and its potential to harm.

Side-by-side tweets about Starbucks labor disputes, left displaying a rally poster reading “One day longer, one day stronger” with the Starbucks siren logo, right showing a Reuters image of former CEO Howard Schultz standing before a large Starbucks emblem

#Brand Reputation