Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Cyabra identified calls for protest against Smithfield Foods circulating on Twitter.  The user's harmful content increases the risk for raised tension at the protests. Cyabra was able to discover the negative comments, some of which posed a serious threat of damage to the brand’s reputation. 

 

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

McDonald’s – Social Media Analysis

June 18, 2024

Cyabra analyzed the main narratives and fake accounts contributing to negative sentiment around McDonald's.

Line area chart comparing positive versus negative McDonald’s mentions on social media between 25 May and 23 June 2024; headline stats show 1,338 total profiles and 488 (36%) classified as negative spreaders

#Brand Reputation

Android – Social Media Analysis

June 20, 2024

Cyabra analyzed the influence of fake profiles discussing Android on X and Facebook.

Line chart comparing authentic and inauthentic Twitter accounts (1,742 total) with a highlighted spike in late May, showing 27% inauthentic profiles, plus thumbnail cards of three accounts marked as fake

#Brand Reputation

New York Community Bank – Social Media Analysis

June 24, 2024

Cyabra scanned the NYCB stock discussions on X and categorized the authenticity and impact of the profiles.

Network diagram of coordinated accounts alongside identical posts marked FAKE in Cyabra’s analysis of New York Community Bank chatter

#Stocks