Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Cyabra identified calls for protest against Smithfield Foods circulating on Twitter.  The user's harmful content increases the risk for raised tension at the protests. Cyabra was able to discover the negative comments, some of which posed a serious threat of damage to the brand’s reputation. 

 

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Mondelēz

November 18, 2022

An analysis of snack foods company Mondelēz, including sentiment and comparative analysis.

Table comparing consumer sentiment for Mondelez, Nestle, Coca-Cola, and Mars Wrigley across product, price, service, and marketing, using green, orange, and red owl icons to signify positive, neutral, and negative reactions

#Brand Reputation

Unmasking the Bot-Driven Boycott Of Amazon

June 25, 2025

Following Amazon’s decision to end its DEI programs, Cyabra uncovered a fake network fueling viral boycott campaigns and distorting public opinion online.

Line graph of social media sentiment toward Amazon from February to May 2025 showing two sharp spikes in negative activity, the first rising 905% in late March and the second surging 26,500% in late May, with engagement count of 1,984 and potential reach of 1.7 million views

#Brand Reputation, Stocks, Threat Actors

Boycott Qatar

October 2, 2021

Identifying both real and fake profiles with discourse surrounding the hashtag, #boycottqatar.

Twitter profile for Boycott Qatar 2022 displaying a banner that reads #BOYCOTT QATAR 2022 with a chained soccer ball

#Brand Reputation, National Security