Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Cyabra identified calls for protest against Smithfield Foods circulating on Twitter.  The user's harmful content increases the risk for raised tension at the protests. Cyabra was able to discover the negative comments, some of which posed a serious threat of damage to the brand’s reputation. 

 

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Nepal’s Protests Show Fake Profiles Driving Real Impact

September 9, 2025

Cyabra reveals how inauthentic actors blended into Nepal’s protests to magnify outrage and reach millions.

#National Security, Threat Actors

Waitrose & Partners

April 2, 2024

Fake campaign of profiles targeting the brand

Collage of three social media screenshots each marked FAKE, showing a cricketer raising a bat, an Urdu quote on a dimly lit room, and an emoji-laden English post, illustrating examples of misinformation flagged in the report

#Brand Reputation

Climate Crisis Misinformation Report

January 2, 2022

An analysis of climate change misinformation spread by real and fake profiles.

Twitter profile named 'GlobalWarmingHoax' with a polar bear avatar, bio stating 'Exposing the Global Warming Myth One Tweet at a Time!', link cafepress.com/warming_hoax, joined October 2009, showing 1,300 following and 1,550 followers

#National Security