Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Cyabra identified calls for protest against Smithfield Foods circulating on Twitter.  The user's harmful content increases the risk for raised tension at the protests. Cyabra was able to discover the negative comments, some of which posed a serious threat of damage to the brand’s reputation. 

 

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Robb Elementary School Shooting

June 2, 2022

An analysis of increased discourse surrounding gun reform, following the Uvalde shooting.

#National Security

Starbucks – Fake Profiles And Negative Narratives Analysis

January 20, 2025

Cyabra analyzed online discourse around Starbucks to identify fake accounts, negative narratives, key influencers, and how the brand stands among its competitors.

Network visualization of accounts discussing Starbucks online, with green, red and photo-avatar nodes linked by light-blue connection lines indicating interaction clusters and potential bot activity

#Brand Reputation, Threat Actors

Phantom Fans Influencing the ESPN Conversation

July 29, 2025

Cyabra revealed that 41% of anti-ESPN discourse came from fake profiles, which reached an estimated audience of 150,000.

#Brand Reputation, Threat Actors