Trump’s Verdict

Cyabra analyzed the prominent sentiment and bot influence discussing Trump's trial verdict.

After the court ruled Donald Trump was guilty on 34 charges, Cyabra revealed a spike in negative sentiment surrounding the trial and its legitimacy.

The conversation also exhibited involvement by inauthentic profiles which accounted for 25% of the conversation and exerted considerable influence over the discussion.

#Elections

Share this report
Visualization of bot-like accounts replying affirmatively to a fabricated Donald J. Trump News poll about a “rigged disgraceful trial,” with fake account labels and a network diagram highlighting coordinated activity
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

How Fake Accounts Fueled the De Beers Backlash

August 17, 2025

Cyabra's technology revealed fake profiles shaping global criticism of De Beers.

#Brand Reputation, Threat Actors

Balenciaga – Misinformation Analysis

December 1, 2022

Analyzing the online conversation regarding Balenciaga’s latest campaign and reputation.

Bar chart illustrating daily social media sentiment toward Balenciaga between 18 Nov and 1 Dec 2022, with small positive peaks early on and steep negative values exceeding −50 percent beginning 22 Nov

#Brand Reputation

Event & Venue Risk Assessment – Barclays

May 11, 2023

Cyabra discovered an account creating conversations about disruptions to Barclays meeting.

Twitter profile for XR Money Rebellion with a bright yellow-green banner stating “IF OUR LIVES WERE BANKS, THEY WOULD HAVE BAILED US BY NOW” and the Extinction Rebellion hourglass logo

#Brand Reputation