Trump’s Verdict

Cyabra analyzed the prominent sentiment and bot influence discussing Trump's trial verdict.

After the court ruled Donald Trump was guilty on 34 charges, Cyabra revealed a spike in negative sentiment surrounding the trial and its legitimacy.

The conversation also exhibited involvement by inauthentic profiles which accounted for 25% of the conversation and exerted considerable influence over the discussion.

#Elections

Share this report
Visualization of bot-like accounts replying affirmatively to a fabricated Donald J. Trump News poll about a “rigged disgraceful trial,” with fake account labels and a network diagram highlighting coordinated activity
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Abortion Misinformation on Social Media

July 2, 2022

Identifying harmful disinformation following The Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v Wade.

Three TikTok posts promoting unproven herbal abortion methods: a pregnant person recommends pennyroyal and mugwort tea, a text slide lists multiple herbs such as mugwort, fleabane, cotton root bark and tansy, and another user in a car endorses black cohosh

#National Security

Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

March 1, 2023

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers

#Brand Reputation

Netflix Fake Campaign

April 30, 2024

Investigation into fake X accounts discussing Netflix, assessing impact and coordination.

Collage of Indonesian tweets using the #Zonauang hashtag to request Netflix account sharing, each stamped with a red “FAKE” label to illustrate a coordinated disinformation effort

#Brand Reputation