Trump’s Verdict

Cyabra analyzed the prominent sentiment and bot influence discussing Trump's trial verdict.

After the court ruled Donald Trump was guilty on 34 charges, Cyabra revealed a spike in negative sentiment surrounding the trial and its legitimacy.

The conversation also exhibited involvement by inauthentic profiles which accounted for 25% of the conversation and exerted considerable influence over the discussion.

#Elections

Share this report
Visualization of bot-like accounts replying affirmatively to a fabricated Donald J. Trump News poll about a “rigged disgraceful trial,” with fake account labels and a network diagram highlighting coordinated activity
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Moscow Terror Attack

March 28, 2024

Cyabra categorizing profiles based on their authenticity and grouped them into communities by connections and shared behaviors.

Bubble chart illustrating clusters of fake online campaigns blaming Israel and the United States for ISIS, with circle size showing campaign volume and green/red colors distinguishing narrative groups

#National Security

Abortion Misinformation on Social Media

July 2, 2022

Identifying harmful disinformation following The Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v Wade.

Three TikTok posts promoting unproven herbal abortion methods: a pregnant person recommends pennyroyal and mugwort tea, a text slide lists multiple herbs such as mugwort, fleabane, cotton root bark and tansy, and another user in a car endorses black cohosh

#National Security

Mondelēz

November 18, 2022

An analysis of snack foods company Mondelēz, including sentiment and comparative analysis.

Table comparing consumer sentiment for Mondelez, Nestle, Coca-Cola, and Mars Wrigley across product, price, service, and marketing, using green, orange, and red owl icons to signify positive, neutral, and negative reactions

#Brand Reputation