Trump’s Verdict

Cyabra analyzed the prominent sentiment and bot influence discussing Trump's trial verdict.

After the court ruled Donald Trump was guilty on 34 charges, Cyabra revealed a spike in negative sentiment surrounding the trial and its legitimacy.

The conversation also exhibited involvement by inauthentic profiles which accounted for 25% of the conversation and exerted considerable influence over the discussion.

#Elections

Share this report
Visualization of bot-like accounts replying affirmatively to a fabricated Donald J. Trump News poll about a “rigged disgraceful trial,” with fake account labels and a network diagram highlighting coordinated activity
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

The effect of the pullout from Russia on the online discourse toward brands

March 2, 2022

An investigation into Twitter conversations surrounding five brands' business decisions with Russia.

Collage of March 3–4 Twitter replies urging LVMH to suspend operations in Russia and criticizing the brand for downplaying the invasion

#Brand Reputation, National Security

Lithuanian-Russian Relations

May 1, 2024

Cyabra analyzed the narrative around Lithuanian-Russian relations on Facebook and X.

Diagram illustrating coordinated bot campaigns featuring colored network clusters of fake accounts, a sample fake profile with map, a propaganda post labelled NATO vs Russia, and a table listing suspicious profiles and networks

#National Security

Netflix Fake Campaign

April 30, 2024

Investigation into fake X accounts discussing Netflix, assessing impact and coordination.

Collage of Indonesian tweets using the #Zonauang hashtag to request Netflix account sharing, each stamped with a red “FAKE” label to illustrate a coordinated disinformation effort

#Brand Reputation