Trump’s Verdict

Cyabra analyzed the prominent sentiment and bot influence discussing Trump's trial verdict.

After the court ruled Donald Trump was guilty on 34 charges, Cyabra revealed a spike in negative sentiment surrounding the trial and its legitimacy.

The conversation also exhibited involvement by inauthentic profiles which accounted for 25% of the conversation and exerted considerable influence over the discussion.

#Elections

Share this report
Visualization of bot-like accounts replying affirmatively to a fabricated Donald J. Trump News poll about a “rigged disgraceful trial,” with fake account labels and a network diagram highlighting coordinated activity
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Daniel Defense

May 2, 2024

Cyabra detected the influence of fake accounts discussing the brand on X.

Area chart comparing activity of 1,039 authentic profiles (green) to 240 inauthentic profiles (red) out of 1,297 total, illustrating engagement trends over several July dates

#Brand Reputation

Climate Crisis Misinformation Report

January 2, 2022

An analysis of climate change misinformation spread by real and fake profiles.

Twitter profile named 'GlobalWarmingHoax' with a polar bear avatar, bio stating 'Exposing the Global Warming Myth One Tweet at a Time!', link cafepress.com/warming_hoax, joined October 2009, showing 1,300 following and 1,550 followers

#National Security

Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

March 1, 2023

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers

#Brand Reputation