Trump’s Verdict

Cyabra analyzed the prominent sentiment and bot influence discussing Trump's trial verdict.

After the court ruled Donald Trump was guilty on 34 charges, Cyabra revealed a spike in negative sentiment surrounding the trial and its legitimacy.

The conversation also exhibited involvement by inauthentic profiles which accounted for 25% of the conversation and exerted considerable influence over the discussion.

#Elections

Share this report
Visualization of bot-like accounts replying affirmatively to a fabricated Donald J. Trump News poll about a “rigged disgraceful trial,” with fake account labels and a network diagram highlighting coordinated activity
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Phishing and Fake Campaigns – eToro

April 1, 2023

Analysis of profiles using eToro’s name to harm consumers by stealing information.

Two side-by-side tweets from look-alike hacker accounts offering to fix hacked or lost financial wallets, each tweet accompanied by a hooded hacker image and hashtags including #eToro

#Brand Reputation

Phishing and Fake Campaigns – E-Trading Companies

April 1, 2023

Uncovering profiles targeting customers of financial service companies, and potential harm done.

Two nearly identical phishing tweets from supposed hacker accounts offering help with hacked trading or crypto-wallet accounts, shown side by side on a purple gradient background with repeated branded hashtags highlighted

#Brand Reputation

Pandora Papers

October 2, 2021

Identifying inauthentic accounts leading the discussion on Pandora Papers in Korea.

Two Twitter replies discussing tax amnesty, Panama Papers, and Pandora Papers on a purple gradient background

#National Security