Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
The Manufactured Outrage Around Swatch
August 27, 2025
Cyabra identified coordinated inauthentic behavior shaping the online narrative following Swatch’s controversial ad campaign.

2024 US Presidential Elections Highlights
November 26, 2024
A round-up of the fake campaigns, disinformation, and online attacks that surrounded the US presidential race.

Brand Reputation – Starbucks
April 1, 2023
Analysis of negative sentiment towards Starbucks and its potential to harm.

