Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
Starbucks – Fake Profiles And Negative Narratives Analysis
January 20, 2025
Cyabra analyzed online discourse around Starbucks to identify fake accounts, negative narratives, key influencers, and how the brand stands among its competitors.

Disinformation – Hamas-Israel War
October 24, 2023
Cyabra analyzed fake profiles participating in conversations about the Hamas-Israel war.

Biden Dropping Out: Disinformation Following the Announcement
July 22, 2024
Cyabra analyzed disinformation following Biden's announcement of quitting the presidential race.

