Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
EA Sports and FIFA 23
August 18, 2022
Analysis of #boycottFIFA23 and negative sentiment regarding the upcoming game FIFA 23.

How Fake Networks Amplified the JPMorgan MicroStrategy Boycott
January 20, 2023
Cyabra's analysis details how JPMorgan’s institutional warnings regarding MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin exposure were weaponized by a coordinated network to incite a widespread bank boycott

Citibank
July 2, 2022
Inauthentic users create one-third of negative content regarding Citibank, primarily on Facebook.

