Boycott Similac

Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.

Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.

#National Security

Share this report
Tweet from Robert Reich stating that 89% of the U.S. baby formula market is dominated by four companies, warning that high concentration magnifies supply shocks like the Similac recall and urging stronger antitrust enforcement against Abbott
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Starbucks – Fake Profiles And Negative Narratives Analysis

January 20, 2025

Cyabra analyzed online discourse around Starbucks to identify fake accounts, negative narratives, key influencers, and how the brand stands among its competitors.

Network visualization of accounts discussing Starbucks online, with green, red and photo-avatar nodes linked by light-blue connection lines indicating interaction clusters and potential bot activity

#Brand Reputation, Threat Actors

Disinformation – Hamas-Israel War

October 24, 2023

Cyabra analyzed fake profiles participating in conversations about the Hamas-Israel war.

Two Twitter posts labeled with red FAKE stamps on a purple gradient background, illustrating examples of misinformation circulating about the Hamas–Israel war

#National Security

Biden Dropping Out: Disinformation Following the Announcement

July 22, 2024

Cyabra analyzed disinformation following Biden's announcement of quitting the presidential race.

#Elections