Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
Impersonation and Phishing – Bank Negara Indonesia
March 30, 2023
An analysis of fake profiles impersonating Bank Negara's customer service pages.

Uncovering Iran’s Online Manipulation Network
July 9, 2025
Following a nationwide blackout in Iran, Cyabra uncovered a coordinated bot network spreading pro-Scottish and pro-Iran narratives on X.

Netflix Fake Campaign
April 30, 2024
Investigation into fake X accounts discussing Netflix, assessing impact and coordination.

