Boycott Similac

Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.

Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.

#National Security

Share this report
Tweet from Robert Reich stating that 89% of the U.S. baby formula market is dominated by four companies, warning that high concentration magnifies supply shocks like the Similac recall and urging stronger antitrust enforcement against Abbott
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Russian Bots

April 2, 2024

Cyabra determines the proportion of fake Twitter (X) accounts discussing Ukraine in December.

Network visualization of online bot clusters showing three fake anti-Ukraine campaigns directed at Israeli, U.S.-Israeli, and French audiences

#National Security

Mondelēz

November 18, 2022

An analysis of snack foods company Mondelēz, including sentiment and comparative analysis.

Table comparing consumer sentiment for Mondelez, Nestle, Coca-Cola, and Mars Wrigley across product, price, service, and marketing, using green, orange, and red owl icons to signify positive, neutral, and negative reactions

#Brand Reputation

Finding two main characteristics of how to identify an effective fake account

May 21, 2024

Cyabra determined characteristics of fake accounts capable of reaching large audiences.

Bar chart showing number of detected fake accounts by age group: 12–25 around 8,000, 26–32 about 3,500, 33–46 roughly 1,800, and 47–62 under 500

#Threat Actors