Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#National Security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
Saudi Arabia ‘Neom Project’
January 2, 2020
An analysis of portions of fake accounts commenting on the Neom Project.
How Bots Are Shaping The Trade Discourse
February 16, 2025
Following the recent trade controversy — the tariffs imposed by U.S. President Trump — Cyabra analyzed social media activity on X to assess how fake...
Online Reputation – First Republic Bank
March 1, 2023
Inauthentic users spreading disinformation created a negative trend toward First Republic Bank.