Citibank

Inauthentic users create one-third of negative content regarding Citibank, primarily on Facebook.

Citibank draws commentary on Facebook and Twitter in three main languages: English, Indonesian and Malay; with the majority of comments originating from Singapore, Cambodia and the Philippines. Some 14.7% of accounts posting negative comment about Citibank are inauthentic, and in the English language, inauthentic profiles created about a third of the content. However, the majority of comments were posted to Twitter, accounting for 74% of comments against Facebook’s 26%.

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Citibank logo on a white card overlapping a red and blue stylized credit card against a purple gradient background
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Saudi Arabia ‘Neom Project’

January 2, 2020

An analysis of portions of fake accounts commenting on the Neom Project.

Area chart showing October 1, 2021 social media activity about the NEOM project; blue line represents all content peaking at nearly 70,000 posts around noon, orange line shows negative content (~7,000 posts), and red line indicates content from fake profiles (~7,500 posts)

#National Security

Planet Fitness

April 2, 2024

Fake profiles spreading the boycott hashtags, with the first ever mention being fake.

Collage of three fabricated Twitter posts labelled FAKE featuring #BoycottPlanetFitness messages, a Planet Fitness trending screenshot, and a pixel-art game image, highlighting disinformation targeting the gym chain

#Brand Reputation

Midterms 2022 Overview

October 2, 2022

Analysis shows inauthentic users prevalent for Democrat and Republican supporting Twitter accounts.

Map showing 2022 U.S. Senate races with Democratic-held states in blue and Republican-held states in red, next to panels listing national and Georgia-specific social media scan topics and hashtags

#Elections