Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Cyabra identified calls for protest against Smithfield Foods circulating on Twitter.  The user's harmful content increases the risk for raised tension at the protests. Cyabra was able to discover the negative comments, some of which posed a serious threat of damage to the brand’s reputation. 

 

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Boycott Woolworths – Fake Activity Analysis

June 12, 2024

Cyabra identified the involvement of fake accounts surrounding the boycott of Woolworths.

Cyabra analytics chart showing 559 total profiles in the Woolworths boycott conversation with 91 (16%) flagged as inauthentic, including a daily trend area graph

#Brand Reputation

Tiffany & Co. Targeted by Massive Fake Profile Networks

November 19, 2025

Cyabra identified that over one-third of accounts discussing Tiffany & Co. were fake, using coordinated narratives to manipulate brand sentiment

#Brand Reputation, Threat Actors

State Farm: Misinformation and Reputation Damage After Wildfires

February 13, 2025

Cyabra uncovered a huge wave of misinformation accusing State Farm of having "prior knowledge" of the wildfires.

Facebook post by a user suggesting State Farm knew of upcoming California wildfires, featuring a news link titled “State Farm Canceled Many Calif. Policies Before Fires” with a photo of a car in front of raging forest flames

#Brand Reputation, Stocks