Trump’s Verdict
Cyabra analyzed the prominent sentiment and bot influence discussing Trump's trial verdict.
After the court ruled Donald Trump was guilty on 34 charges, Cyabra revealed a spike in negative sentiment surrounding the trial and its legitimacy.
The conversation also exhibited involvement by inauthentic profiles which accounted for 25% of the conversation and exerted considerable influence over the discussion.
#Elections
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
Planet Fitness
April 2, 2024
Fake profiles spreading the boycott hashtags, with the first ever mention being fake.
The Rising Influence of Fake Accounts in the Online Climate Change Conversation
November 23, 2025
Cyabra’s latest analysis gives a data-driven look at how inauthentic profiles amplify climate misinformation across online conversations.
Brexit Disinformation Campaign
January 2, 2020
Analysis of fake accounts discussing Brexit and the harm of negative messaging.
