Trump’s Verdict
Cyabra analyzed the prominent sentiment and bot influence discussing Trump's trial verdict.
After the court ruled Donald Trump was guilty on 34 charges, Cyabra revealed a spike in negative sentiment surrounding the trial and its legitimacy.
The conversation also exhibited involvement by inauthentic profiles which accounted for 25% of the conversation and exerted considerable influence over the discussion.
#Elections
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
How Inauthentic Networks Fueled Indonesia’s Unrest
September 3, 2025
Findings from Cyabra uncover widespread fake profiles manipulating discourse and fueling polarization during Indonesia’s protests.
Bot Networks Amplify Controversial US Influencers
May 6, 2024
Cyabra analysis of high fake follower rates and interactions on influencer posts.
The Rising Influence of Fake Accounts in the Online Climate Change Conversation
November 23, 2025
Cyabra’s latest analysis gives a data-driven look at how inauthentic profiles amplify climate misinformation across online conversations.
