Trump’s Verdict

Cyabra analyzed the prominent sentiment and bot influence discussing Trump's trial verdict.

After the court ruled Donald Trump was guilty on 34 charges, Cyabra revealed a spike in negative sentiment surrounding the trial and its legitimacy.

The conversation also exhibited involvement by inauthentic profiles which accounted for 25% of the conversation and exerted considerable influence over the discussion.

#Elections

Share this report
Visualization of bot-like accounts replying affirmatively to a fabricated Donald J. Trump News poll about a “rigged disgraceful trial,” with fake account labels and a network diagram highlighting coordinated activity
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

PR Misconceptions – Posting Times

October 2, 2022

Individual brand analysis of customers’ social activity identifies optimum times for posting.

Side-by-side heat maps comparing the best engagement times on Twitter and Facebook, with darker blue blocks showing peak activity across different hours and days

#Brand Reputation

Insider Threats – Toyota

February 1, 2023

Discovery of former Toyota employee sharing harmful content to the brand's reputation.

Tweet by a former Toyota Group employee alleging the company treats workers like disposable parts and positions itself in right-to-work states to keep union membership low, posted on Feb 22 2023

#Brand Reputation

Brexit Disinformation Campaign

January 2, 2020

Analysis of fake accounts discussing Brexit and the harm of negative messaging.

Retweeted tweet criticizing Brexit, featuring a stylized Union Jack overlaid with the words “BREXITEERS YOU OWN IT”

#National Security