Trump’s Verdict

Cyabra analyzed the prominent sentiment and bot influence discussing Trump's trial verdict.

After the court ruled Donald Trump was guilty on 34 charges, Cyabra revealed a spike in negative sentiment surrounding the trial and its legitimacy.

The conversation also exhibited involvement by inauthentic profiles which accounted for 25% of the conversation and exerted considerable influence over the discussion.

#Elections

Share this report
Visualization of bot-like accounts replying affirmatively to a fabricated Donald J. Trump News poll about a “rigged disgraceful trial,” with fake account labels and a network diagram highlighting coordinated activity
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Phantom Fans Influencing the ESPN Conversation

July 29, 2025

Cyabra revealed that 41% of anti-ESPN discourse came from fake profiles, which reached an estimated audience of 150,000.

#Brand Reputation, Threat Actors

Morocco Trade Deals Cancellation over Western Sahara

October 2, 2021

High level of inauthentic profiles within discussions regarding EU-Moroccan trade deals.

Tweet from account named davide asserting Western Sahara has always been Moroccan and criticizing Algeria, overlaid with a red 'FAKE' stamp indicating misinformation

#National Security

Russian Bots

April 2, 2024

Cyabra determines the proportion of fake Twitter (X) accounts discussing Ukraine in December.

Network visualization of online bot clusters showing three fake anti-Ukraine campaigns directed at Israeli, U.S.-Israeli, and French audiences

#National Security