Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#national security
Related reports
Insider Threats – Amazon
February 1, 2023
Uncovering prior Amazon employees sharing content attempting to harm the brand’s reputation
![](https://cyabra.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/amazoninsider.jpg)
Engagements Vs. Exposure – 5 PR Misconceptions
January 16, 2023
An analysis of common PR Misconceptions on social media.
![](https://cyabra.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Screen-Shot-2023-07-20-at-11.21.11-AM.png)
Climate Crisis Misinformation Report
January 2, 2022
An analysis of climate change misinformation spread by real and fake profiles.
![](https://cyabra.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Screen-Shot-2023-07-20-at-11.41.49-AM.png)