Boycott Similac
Authenticity analysis of the profiles spreading negative Twitter conversation on Similac.
Analysis of over 20,000 Twitter accounts who commented on Similac and Abbott found that just over 5% of comments were from inauthentic users. However, in total, nearly a quarter of comments were negative, with much of the negative commentary coming from authentic users, many of whom regularly comment on parenting matters. Two inauthentic users who drove negative commentary were heavily tied into a community of inauthentic accounts.
#national security
Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox
Related reports
DeepSeek AI: Coordinated Fake Campaign
February 9, 2025
Cyabra uncovered a network of fake profiles promoting the hype around DeepSeek AI.
Impersonation – Bank of America
May 11, 2023
Cyabra discovered 7 identical accounts impersonating Bank of America’s customer service.
Gucci – Social Media Conversation
July 2, 2021
Analysis of inauthentic accounts discussing Gucci on Twitter, and the negative impact.
