Burger King – Social Media Analysis

Cyabra analyzed the main narratives and fake accounts driving negative sentiment toward Burger King.

Cyabra detected a spike in negative sentiment surrounding Burger King on X and determined that 37% of content was negative.

Fake profiles largely distributed the content which posed reputation risks to the brand, accounting for 39% of profiles discussing Burger King.

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Line graph tracking Burger King–related social media profiles between 25 May and 23 June 2024, displaying 862 total profiles with a peak surge at the end of May; green line represents 524 authentic profiles (60%) and red line represents 337 inauthentic profiles (39%)
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

Disinformation Brand Reputation – WalletInvestor

May 11, 2023

Cyabra identified a bot account that spreads disinformation about WalletInvestor.

Tweet by user Vendetta warning investors about WalletInvestor, alleging the service charges a $1 signup fee followed by a yearly charge with no refunds, accompanied by a placeholder graphic stating 'File not found'

#Brand Reputation

Analyzing Fake Campaigns in the Upcoming U.S. Elections

May 26, 2024

A fake X campaign targets Biden, and promotes Trump, reaching 185 million views.

Dashboard showing analysis of 2,617 social media profiles, 534 labeled inauthentic versus 1,874 authentic, plus heat-map activity and two leading narratives: “Vote for Trump” and “Biden is the worst president”

#Elections

Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

March 1, 2023

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers

#Brand Reputation