Social Media Analysis – Epstein Island

Effects of the discussion of Epstein’s Island on social media are analyzed.

In this report, the discussion about Epstein’s Island on social media was studied. The leading narratives are reviewed along with an in depth examination of the main issues of the case. Additionally, Cyabra analyzes the effects that this had on brands that were discussed in relation to Epstein’s Island.

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Tweet alleging child predators from Epstein Island remain free, with hashtags about crimes against humanity, Epstein Island, and client list, above a partially visible list titled 'Epstein’s Island Visitors'
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

RipCurl Boycott

April 2, 2024

Fake campaign of fake accounts calling to boycott the brand.

Line chart depicting a 424% surge in online mentions of Rip Curl from Jan 21–27 2024, above thumbnails of viral social media posts advocating a boycott of the surf brand

#Brand Reputation

Daniel Defense

May 2, 2024

Cyabra detected the influence of fake accounts discussing the brand on X.

Area chart comparing activity of 1,039 authentic profiles (green) to 240 inauthentic profiles (red) out of 1,297 total, illustrating engagement trends over several July dates

#Brand Reputation

Netflix Fake Campaign

April 30, 2024

Investigation into fake X accounts discussing Netflix, assessing impact and coordination.

Collage of Indonesian tweets using the #Zonauang hashtag to request Netflix account sharing, each stamped with a red “FAKE” label to illustrate a coordinated disinformation effort

#Brand Reputation