Social Risk Analysis – Smithfield Foods

Online profiles spread extremist content against Smithfield Foods prior to protests.

Cyabra identified calls for protest against Smithfield Foods circulating on Twitter.  The user's harmful content increases the risk for raised tension at the protests. Cyabra was able to discover the negative comments, some of which posed a serious threat of damage to the brand’s reputation. 

 

#Brand Reputation

Share this report
Tweet from Raven Deerbrook thanking Andy Greenberg and Wired, urging the USDA to stop Smithfield Foods from hiding animal cruelty in gas chambers, with hashtags StopGasChambers, SmithfieldGasChambers, USDA, and a quoted tweet describing pigs being asphyxiated in CO2 chambers
Share this report

Fill up the form below and receive the full report directly to your inbox

Related reports

The “Economic Blackout” Boycott: A Cyabra Research

March 6, 2025

Cyabra uncovered fake profiles amplifying #EconomicBlackout hashtag to attack major brands such as Amazon, Target, Best Buy and Walmart.

Collage of fabricated social media posts promoting an economic blackout on February 28, 2025, featuring a protest crowd photo, headline snippets, and a black poster with a fist-and-chain logo, all marked fake

#Brand Reputation, Stocks

Nepal’s Protests Show Fake Profiles Driving Real Impact

September 9, 2025

Cyabra reveals how inauthentic actors blended into Nepal’s protests to magnify outrage and reach millions.

#National Security, Threat Actors

RipCurl Boycott

April 2, 2024

Fake campaign of fake accounts calling to boycott the brand.

Line chart depicting a 424% surge in online mentions of Rip Curl from Jan 21–27 2024, above thumbnails of viral social media posts advocating a boycott of the surf brand

#Brand Reputation