6 Hours to Narrative Shift: The Battle of Influence in US-Venezuela Operation

On January 3, 2026, the United States launched a military strike on Venezuela and captured President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, indicting them on several charges related to narcoterrorism

Cyabra’s analysis of online conversations related to this operation uncovered a battle of influence: sophisticated influence operation surrounding the U.S. military operation in Venezuela and the reported capture of President Nicolás Maduro. The investigation revealed how bad actors deployed coordinated networks as they battled over narrative control, dramatically reversing public perception from pro-U.S. to anti-U.S. in just one single day.

The Anatomy of a Coordinated Influence Operation

What made the influence operation around the U.S. military action in Venezuela so significant was not merely its scale, but the precision of its execution – starting weeks before the operation was launched, and shifting public opinion in real-time before, after and during the operation.

Cyabra’s analysis found that 23% of the profiles engaged in the U.S.-Venezuela discourse were fake, more than three times the baseline of inauthentic accounts online. These 4,036 fake profiles generated 4,878 posts and comments, achieving a potential reach of over 641 million views, and more than 329,101 engagements.

On January 3 alone, coordinated fake profiles gained 223,864 engagements in a single day. Network analysis revealed a particularly active cluster of just 66 fake profiles, located in Venezuela, that garnered 190,000 potential views through 112 posts and comments, laying the groundwork for the broader narrative shift.

The fake network located in Venezuela included just 66 fake profiles – but achieved a reach of 190,000 views.

The Bot Battle: From Preparation to Reversal

Pre-Operation (December 22-24, 2025):

A network of 485 fake profiles generated 554 posts and comments, designed to prepare public opinion for U.S. military intervention. These profiles strategically amplified narratives portraying Maduro as a criminal ruler involved in drug trafficking, deliberately echoing rhetoric from Donald Trump.

These profiles operated with subtle coordination based on similar content with varied phrasing, overlapping posting times, and no visible network connections. This approach gave the campaign an organic appearance while framing military action as the only viable response to what they characterized as Maduro’s “narco-regime.”

Fake profiles started manipulating public opinion weeks before the military operation was launched.

Operation Day (January 3, 2026):

The operation goes next level: Fake profiles flooded social media with uniform, military-style messaging, establishing a single interpretation: a successful, justified U.S. military operation. Coordination became more visible through posts published within minutes of each other, identical terminology across hundreds of profiles, and consistent military framing using terms like “large-scale strike” and “capture.” Attempting to look informative and objective, those profiles portrayed the United States as the prevailing actor.

Posts during the day of the attack promoted U.S. dominance narratives

The Six-Hour Narrative Reversal:

Within just six hours after the military operation started, Cyabra identified a complete narrative reversal that transformed public discourse from pro-U.S. to anti-U.S. Large groups of profiles worked in parallel to reinforce emotionally charged and accusatory messaging, creating the appearance of widespread public outrage and international consensus. This shift reframed the operation as an “illegal kidnapping,” portrayed the U.S. as an aggressor, and repositioned Maduro as a legitimate leader and victim.

Following the narrative shift, fake profiles promoting the new anti-U.S. narrative exhibited clear signs of coordination.

Hashtag Weaponization

Central to the post-operation narrative reversal was the strategic weaponization of specific hashtags by the anti-U.S. campaign. Cyabra’s analysis found that these hashtags served as key amplification hubs:

  • #VenezuelaLibre: Approximately 30% of profiles using this hashtag were identified as fake
  • #AmericaLatinaLibre: Up to 69% of profiles using this hashtag were identified as inauthentic

These hashtags served as coordination mechanisms, supporting the illusion of widespread public consensus, establishing emotional framing around Venezuela’s sovereignty, and attracting genuine engagement.

Pre vs. Post: Different Coordination Playbooks

Cyabra’s investigation identified distinctly different tactics between phases, revealing a trade-off between sophistication and speed:

Pre-Operation (More Sophisticated): Limited visible connections between profiles, subtle message variations while maintaining core themes, and organic-appearing posting times. This highly sophisticated coordination model was designed to fly under the radar and appear authentic.

Post-Operation (Less Sophisticated, Higher Volume): Clear network connections, identical content across clusters, heavy reliance on emotional hashtags like #VenezuelaLibre (69% fake profiles) and #AmericaLatinaLibre (30% fake profiles), concentrated posting during specific time windows, abnormally low engagement rates despite high reach, and geographic clustering (such as the 66 profiles all located in Venezuela). The dense network activity was designed to create the impression of widespread outrage through speed and volume rather than stealth.

The New Battlefield of Narrative Control

For government agencies, the most concerning aspect of the Venezuela case study should be the speed of narrative transformation and the success of the influence operations campaigns. Within just six hours, coordinated networks completely reversed public perception from viewing a U.S. military operation as justified to framing it as illegal and imperialistic. This capability to swiftly and rapidly reshape public opinion poses a significant threat to government operations that rely on public support.

For intelligence agencies, election integrity commissions, and government communications departments, understanding coordination patterns, timing strategies, and narrative manipulation techniques is essential to protecting the information environment during critical national security operations.

Download the full report

Learn More

What intelligence implications can be learned from the U.S.-Venezuela operation?

For government agencies, this case highlights critical warning signs:
* Abnormal content volume spikes around significant events
* Uniform messaging across large numbers of profiles
* Hashtag clusters with high percentages of inauthentic profiles
* Rapid narrative reversals within narrow timeframes
* Coordinated posting patterns across seemingly unconnected accounts

What protection methods should government agencies implement to protect public discourse?

* Real-time monitoring systems focused on coordination patterns
* Hashtag analysis protocols to identify unusual levels of inauthentic activity
* Network visualization tools revealing hidden connections between accounts
* Rapid response capabilities addressing narrative shifts within hours, not days
* Pre-positioned verified information to counter anticipated narrative reversals

Why do influence operations target hashtags?

Hashtags serve as amplification engines on social media platforms. By dominating trending hashtags, coordinated networks can: reach users beyond their immediate followers, create the illusion of widespread public consensus, attract authentic users who engage with trending topics, establish emotional framing around events, and ensure their narratives appear in search results and platform recommendations. Hashtags transform localized coordination into platform-wide visibility.

Why is speed critical in countering influence operations?

Modern influence operations can reverse public narratives within hours, not days. By the time traditional fact-checking or response mechanisms activate, the manipulated narrative may already dominate public discourse and shape policy decisions. Real-time monitoring and rapid response capabilities (within hours) are essential because once a narrative becomes entrenched, correcting it requires significantly more effort and may never fully succeed.

Related posts

McWho? Bad Actors Impersonating McDonald’s

McDonald’s is one of the most impersonated brands online.  McDonald’s Impersonations didn’t start in 2023. A 2017’s imposter account fooled not only the entirety of...

McDonald’s restaurant facade on a purple pixelated tech backdrop, surrounded by vulgar fake tweets and angry reaction emojis that illustrate social media impersonators tarnishing the brand

Rotem Baruchin

December 18, 2023

How Individuals Can Identify and Protect Themselves From Fake News on Social Media

Fake news refers to fabricated information that’s spread with the intent to deceive the population. Although false stories have been disseminated throughout human history, the...

Rotem Baruchin

July 9, 2024

The Fast, the Furious, and the Frustrated: Toyota’s Insider Threat

Did your company recently commit massive layoffs? You’re not alone. The global economic crisis caused even huge enterprises like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon to resort...

Red downward arrow branded Toyota surrounded by angry and sad emojis while a man extends from a smartphone yelling and giving thumbs-down, symbolizing insider threats and reputational decline

Rotem Baruchin

March 26, 2023